ASIC provides guidance on choice
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has sought to clarify the position of employers and organisations with respect to talking with employees about the new choice of superannuation fund regime.
The regulator’s advice has come at the same time as employers have been receiving widespread warnings about their potential exposure to penalties if they offer specific advice on superannuation without holding a financial service license.
ASIC’s executive director of consumer protection, Greg Tanzer said that the regulator understood that with the introduction of choice from July 1, many employers would be asked by their employees to provide information about what super choice is and how employees can nominate a super fund.
He said ASIC intended to ensure that during this process, employers avoided providing information to employees either orally or in some other form that amounted to financial product advice.
Tanzer said the guidance being provided by ASIC was in the form of frequently asked questions which cautioned employers against providing financial advice, explains what constitutes financial advice and discusses the type and nature of factual information employers can provide without being licensed, including examples of how employers can provide information on super choice to employees.
“ASIC understands that employers are new to the financial services regime, and will be doing their best to comply with the new obligations,” he said.
Tanzer said that in the early stages of super choice, ASIC would be taking a balanced approach to employers who inadvertently provided superannuation advice without being licensed.
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
