ASIC prosecutes MFS companies and directors

chief executive fund manager chief financial officer australian securities and investments commission director

2 November 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced civil proceedings in the Queensland Supreme Court against four former officers and three subsidiary companies of the formerly-listed MFS Ltd, now known as Octaviar.

The regulator said the proceedings related to the use of $147.5 million in funds of the Premium Income Fund (PIF), of which MFS Investment Management, now known as Managed Investments Limited, was the responsible entity.

ASIC named the defendants in the matter as the former chief executive and director of MFS Limited and MFS Investment Management, Michael King, deputy chief executive Craig White, the former chief executive of MFS Investment Management, Guy Hutchings, the former chief financial officer and company secretary of MFS Limited, David Anderson, and a former fund manager with MFSIM, Marilyn Watts.

The regulator also said action had been commenced with respect to Managed Investments Limited, Octaviar Administration Pty Ltd and Octaviar Castle Limited.

ASIC said it was seeking orders for declarations of contraventions, pecuniary penalties, compensation and disqualifications from managing corporations.

The regulator said it would be alleging that in November 2007, officers of MFSIM caused PIF to transfer $130 million to MFS Administration Pty Ltd so that MFS Administration could use those funds to pay the financial obligations of other MFS Limited subsidiaries, including $103 million owed to Fortress Credit Corporation (Australia) Pty Ltd by MFS Castle Pty Ltd.

ASIC said it would also allege that in December 2007 officers of MFSIM caused PIF to transfer $17.5 million to MFS Pacific Finance Ltd, a New Zealand registered company.

It would also be alleged that in about January last year, officers and the fund manager of MFSIM created and used false documents relating to the use of the $147.5 million, as a result of which it would be alleged that PIF suffered a loss of $147.5 million.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 2 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 4 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 4 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

4 days 11 hours ago

A relevant provider has received a written direction from the Financial Services and Credit Panel after a superannuation rollover resulted in tax bill of over $200,000 fo...

4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS