ASIC permanently bans man for spruiking

ASIC ASIC bans financial planning

25 September 2017
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has banned permanently John Dimitropoulos of Seven Hills, New South Wales, from financial services and credit in connection with property and self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) spruiking.

Dimitropoulos' banning arises from ASIC's ongoing investigation into a property and self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) promoting group, which includes the companies formerly called Heritage Financial Solutions Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) and Sunpac Finance Pty Ltd.

Additionally, at all relevant times Dimitropoulos was the sole director of Sunpac Finance and while he was never appointed as a director of Heritage Financial Solutions, the regulator found that he had been an integral part in the management of Heritage Financial Solutions.

Also, Dimitropoulos was found to be “likely to contravene credit legislation and financial services law in future”, ASIC said.

The ASIC’s investigation proved that between July, 2010, and mid-2013 he was engaged in a range of contraventions under financial services and credit laws. In particular, he:

  • Made false statements to ASIC in Sunpac Finance’s annual compliance certificates about Sunpac Finance’s compliance processes and procedures
  • Was involved in Sunapac Finance and Heritage Financial solutions’ breaches of their general conduct obligations as credit licensees
  • Was involved in Hertitage Financial Solutions carrying on a financial services business without a license; and
  • Engaged in conduct that demonstrated a fundamental lack of understanding of and regard for compliance and law

ASIC deputy chair Peter Kell, said: “Spruikers who recommend people invest in property via SMSFs, or facilitate such an investment, and who do not have an Australian financial services licence are breaking the law.

ASIC made its decision in June and Dimitropoulos filed for its review in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), together with an application seeking a stay of the banning decision and a confidentiality order.

In September, AAT informed it had refused the application.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 1 week ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month 3 weeks ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

3 days 22 hours ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS