ASIC outlines guidance for 2023 adviser exams

FASEA ASIC adviser exam exam

24 November 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has shared information about how the adviser exam will be run in 2023.

The exam had been running frequent sessions ahead of the 30 September, 2022 deadline but these sittings would likely reduce in number next year as the exam would be primarily for new entrants.

In light of this, all exams would move to an online test only instead of running from exam centres.

Speaking at the FPA Professional Congress in Sydney, Leah Sciacca, senior executive leader at ASIC, told the audience she expected the regulator to release the dates for 2023 sittings soon but there would be no format changes.

“We will be releasing dates for the 2023 sittings imminently, they should come out next week.

“Regarding the format of the exam, it was previously administered by FASEA and that has now moved to ASIC but the format and the professional standards are a matter for the Minister. The format and the feedback for the exam is very prescriptive.

“Any changes to this will be a matter for the Minister and for Government.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Same Sh*t Same Smell on Thu, 2022-11-24 13:24

Yes, they simply can't leave it as a venue held exam...

This quarter, we have 4 advisers sitting the exam in Melbourne, 5 in Sydney, 2 in Brisbane and 1 each in Perth and Adelaide, with no new entrants in Tasmania.

The results are going to be even more interesting...

We had 9 people pass the exam, with 4 failing... a 69.2% pass rate!!!

LOL!!!

Submitted by Anon on Thu, 2022-11-24 21:21

FASEA exam was a means for culling advisers. It has not improved advice to clients. It will not prevent fraud in the future. So, it's like the lock on your front door, looks good, but it won't stop real criminal from getting in.

Cull advisers and then do a quality of advice review (should read quantity) and give the industry to the banks.

Submitted by anno on Fri, 2022-11-25 10:13

New entrants should have the exam worked into their university degree. An exam with a cost of $970 that they can't put on HECS is not fair as I've seen job posting requiring the exam already be completed before starting the PY. Not every business will want to put the money towards the exam.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS