ASIC orders investigation costs



The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced it would use its powers to more regularly recover costs of an investigation from the person who they investigate.
The corporate regulator said it rarely recovered its investigation expenses but decided to do so after reviewing its approach.
It said it would order compensation of its investigation costs under section 91 of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 if, after the investigation, a person is convicted of an offence.
It would also ask to recover costs if a judgement is made against the person, or another order is made against the person in a court proceeding.
It said it would order the person pay for the whole or specific part of the investigation, or costs to ASIC of carrying out the investigation, including salary costs of ASIC staff involved in carrying out the investigation, travel expenses of those who had to interview witnesses, external legal counsel costs, and the costs of employing experts to analyse the case.
The new orders are applicable immediately and will also apply to investigations that started before the release of this information sheet unless court proceedings have already begun, or an agreement has been reached with the person to resolve the matter.
Those who do not adhere to the order may be subject to a penalty of $8500 or a one year jail term, or both.
Recommended for you
ETF provider VanEck has announced its intention to launch a uranium and energy solution as global political agendas point to expansion in this sector.
PIMCO has announced the launch of a new active fixed-income ETF, marking its fifth active solution on the Australian market after the launch of four ETFs earlier in the year.
With the Australian advice market being a target for US private equity firms, a US advice commentator has shared lessons from his overseas experience, and why PE may be less attractive than initially expected.
Financial advisers are reminded to ensure their CPD is up to date with the Financial Services and Credit Panel making its second determination in a week after an adviser failed to meet the requirements.