ASIC opts not to pursue Reserve Bank companies
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released only the briefest of explanations about why it will not be initiating action as a result of the Australian Federal Police (AFP) investigation in to the Reserve Bank (RBA)-related companies Securency International and Note Printing Australia (NPA).
The regulator said that the AFP had provided it with material relating to bribery allegations concerning the two RBA-related companies and that ASIC "considers a range of factors when deciding to investigate and possibly take enforcement action".
"In line with its normal practice, ASIC has reviewed this material from the AFP for possible directors' duty breaches of the Corporations Act and has decided not to proceed to formal investigation," the statement said.
The regulator said it intended to make no further comment on the matter.
Following a two-year investigation in co-operation with foreign agencies, the AFP in July charged NPA, Securency and seven former staff over alleged bribes paid to public officials in Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam between 1999 and 2005 to secure banknote contracts.
In evidence given during hearings in the Melbourne Magistrates Court last year, the AFP said the charges did not reflect that individual board members at the companies were complicit or had knowledge of any illegal activity.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
