ASIC: no post-FSR mercy for non-licensees

compliance/financial-services-licence/financial-services-reform/financial-services-business/executive-director/investments-commission/

21 January 2004
| By Craig Phillips |

TheAustralian Securities and Investments Commission(ASIC) has warned it will crack down on any organisation continuing to operate post-March 10 without a valid Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) after revealing it is yet to receive an estimated 900 applications.

The peak regulator is likely to be tough in dealing with any groups failing to meet the deadline with ASIC executive director of financial services regulation, Ian Johnston stressing the regulator has spent the past two year insisting businesses lodge their applications early.

“During the two-year transition period of the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA), ASIC has consistently warned financial services businesses to lodge their licence applications as early as possible. We have provided extensive guidance to help industry make the transition to the new licensing regime,” Johnston says.

The outstanding application figure of 900 comes despite ASIC downwardly revising its application estimates to take into account “structural changes within the industry”.

ASIC is now contacting each potential applicant, and informing them that as the assessment process is relatively simple for these applicants, any application lodged before the end of January will be assessed before the March deadline.

“To date, ASIC has issued over 2500 licences, with more than 1000 applications currently being assessed. We expect that the vast majority of these will receive their licence by the March 10 2004 deadline,” Johnston says.

It is an offence to carry on a financial services business without a licence, an offence punishable by a fine of $22,000 or imprisonment for two years, or both, ASIC warns.

After March 10, ASIC will conduct surveillance of businesses illegally operating without a licence or otherwise not complying with financial services laws, with it emphasizing that compliance is intended to protect the interests of consumers and uphold the integrity of the industry.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 1 day ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 6 days ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS