ASIC levy to continue to fund litigation

ASIC ASIC levy funding litigation asic enforcement enforcement

26 August 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

The corporate watchdog has outlined that 80% of its funding will be used towards enforcement, supervision, and surveillance activities during the financial year 2021-22.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) published its corporate plan which said it would continue to “be a strong and targeted law enforcement agency”.

“As ASIC is a law enforcement agency, the volume and results of our surveillance and enforcement activities will remain an important measure of our performance,” it said.

“It will also continue to be of significant interest to our stakeholders and the wider community.”

ASIC chair, Joe Longo, said in his message that the regulator would: “remain an active litigator against misconduct. We will use our full suite of tools and powers to address wrongdoing.

“Our enforcement actions will prioritise areas of greatest harm and the protection of vulnerable consumers and investors.”

ASIC noted that its total funding of $462.6 million in 2021-22 was 6% down from the previous year.

“Our departmental operating appropriation for 2021–22 is $423 million, down 4% due to reduced funding following the partial transfer of the registry function to the Australian Taxation Office,” it said.

“We take a strategic approach to the allocation of our budget so that we can deliver on our priorities. We also maintain flexibility in our budgeting to ensure that our priorities can quickly adapt where there are changes in our regulatory environment during the year.”

ASIC said its industry funding model was a combination of:

  • Cost recovery levies, for ongoing regulatory activities that are consistent with the Australian Government Charging Framework;
  • Statutory industry levies, for activities the Australian Government has decided should be cross-subsidised between industry subsectors; and
  • Cost recovery fees, for user-initiated, transaction based activities where we provide a specific service to individual entities.

The financial planning industry has recently called for enforcement activity to be removed from the adviser levy. This was due to the exponential increase in the levy over the last few years and given its litigation activities were against large institutions that had largely exited the industry but the activity was being funded by smaller advice practices.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS