ASIC to implement adviser exam changes
ASIC has confirmed it is incorporating legislative amendments to the financial adviser exam, with the March exam set to reflect the changes.
On 14 December 2023, the government first announced draft legislation to amend the adviser exam, including:
- Removing the short answer questions from the exam and increasing the number of multiple choice questions.
- Removing the requirement limiting exam participation to new financial advisers who have completed an approved degree and existing providers.
ASIC is now incorporating the approved changes for the administration of the adviser exam that were registered on 18 January 2024.
The changes will be reflected in the next exam to be held on 26 March 2024, which was pushed back from 15 February to allow sufficient time to implement the required changes.
“All candidates will be held to the same standard as for previous exams,” ASIC stated.
Following the December announcement, Professional Year (PY) candidates are largely expectant of a decrease in the cost to sit the exam if greater efficiencies are generated from computer marking.
The Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA) also joined the collective push for a reduced fee earlier this month.
“This method of assessment is also cheaper to run, and we would expect to see a reduction in the cost of the exam as a result. The cost is now $1,500 per attempt, almost three times higher than it was when the exam was first introduced in 2019,” said Sarah Abood, FAAA chief executive.
Moreover, the Stockbrokers and Investment Advisers Association recently lobbied for additional recommendations to improve the exam.
This includes allowing candidates to sit the exam at any time rather than being bound by an exam timetable, adding a broader range of scenarios in the test and encouraging more tailored feedback to be given to unsuccessful candidates.
AUTHOR
Jasmine Siljic
Recommended for you
ASIC data shows the number of smaller AFSLs with less than $50 million in revenue has increased by 25 per cent in the past year, but the regulator believes they are still under reporting breaches.
Former financial adviser and Coalition backbencher Bert van Manen has introduced a bill in Parliament, building on Michelle Levy’s good advice duty and calling for SOAs to be scrapped.
Following its recent partnership with Otivo, Colonial First State has now announced an arrangement with Viridian Advisory to offer unadvised members with one-off, topic-based financial advice.
Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand.
All part of the plan to make it easier for people to become authorised salespeople for the product providers. Stephen Jones and the ALP continue dancing to the tune of their political donors.
Nice to see ASIC finally get ribbed for the RORTING they've done to the advisers who put up with their Exam Fee GOUGING the last 12 months.
ASIC have been utterly disgraceful in the way they've managed this from Jan 2022. I walked away from being a Personal Advice adviser of 15 years when I saw the Jan 2022 exam results show an initial failure rate of 94% and they increased the original fee of just under $600 go to just under $1,000. I was not succumbing to such abhorrent behaviour and blatant gouging. Glad I did too with zero regrets. I wouldn't go back to personal/full advice even if they sent me a complementary exam pass now.
Good luck to those unfortunate advisers still dealing with ASIC's horrendous conduct.