ASIC hits out at 'disappointing' efforts by ME Bank
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has hit out at ME Bank over the “disappointing” way it handled its problems over client mortgages and said it has had an “avoidable impact” on consumer confidence.
The session, which was called by committee chair Tim Wilson, was inquiring around industry super fund-backed bank ME Bank’s conduct around changing clients’ mortgage redraw arrangements.
ME Bank hit the news last month after unilaterally reducing clients’ mortgage positions by reducing their drawdown facilities without informing them first. The firm claimed it had made the move to prevent customers falling behind on their repayments.
ASIC said between 23-27 April, 2020, ME Bank made adjustments to the arrangements of 21,000 clients.
ASIC said this was not the first time ME Bank had faced redraw problems, having first dealt with the firm in March 2013 when it identified a number of home loans where the amount available to redraw was incorrectly stated.
In a speech to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, ASIC commissioner Sean Hughes said the negative impact of ME Bank’s actions were exacerbated by the financial problems caused by COVID-19.
“ASIC does have concerns about how this matter has been handled. At a time when there are significant sensitives for consumers about the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, this matter could have and should have been handled better by ME Bank,” he said.
“It was ASIC’s expectation that ME Bank would communicate with their customers in a clear and transparent manner before making any adjustments to redraw facilities.
“This should have occurred in any normal setting, but in this instance there should have been heightened awareness and sensitivity to explain to customers what was happening to their account balances and why, given the strained economic environment impacting households.”
He said the regulator would continue to monitor the situation to ensure customers received a positive outcome. There had already been 80 complaints made to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) about the situation but Hughes said he expected most would be resolved quickly.
“ASIC will continue to closely monitor ME Bank’s conduct and engage with the bank on this issue, so as to ensure a fair and transparent outcome for ME Bank’s customers. This has been a disappointing experience for ME Bank and has had an avoidable impact on customer confidence,” Hughes said.
“We understand that AFCA has received approximately 80 complaints regarding this issue. However, ASIC understands many have already been resolved, and following a discussion with ME Bank, AFCA are confident that most, if not all, would be resolved at an early stage.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
