ASIC highlights Macquarie’s advice and record keeping failures

financial services licence australian financial services enforceable undertaking ASIC macquarie peter kell financial ombudsman service australian securities and investments commission

15 August 2014
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

Macquarie Equities Limited (MEL) had "very poor" record keeping and lack of detail in its advice documents, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Speaking at a media conference ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell said the regulator had found examples at MEL's "failure to demonstrate reasonable basis for the advice provided to clients."

"We were concerned about whether there were adequate risk policies and processes and controls in place. We found client files not actually containing the required statement of advice," he said.

The comments come as ASIC announced it will probe into former financial advisers with the Macquarie group MEL and contact 160,000 clients who received advice from Macquarie Private Wealth (MPW) since March 2004, when MEL obtained its Australian financial services licence, about the possible provision of remediation for poor financial advice.

Kell said Macquarie had initially targeted "priority" clients, who might have had problematic advisers, but ASIC had broadened this to include 160,000 clients over the ten years.

However he refused to divulge how many violation reports had been recorded, how many MPW advisers or former advisers are under investigation and how many advisers have lost their jobs due to the enforceable undertaking (EU).

Asked why remediation was not provided during the first stage of the EU, Kell said it took time to investigate who should be covered under the remediation, pinpoint the problematic areas of advice, and the effect on clients. He added they needed to work out if there were particular financial advisers whose clients needed to be given greater priority.

Under the compensation process, clients can request an initial assessment of the advice they got, which will be carried out by a Macquarie advice review committee.

Clients can also ask for an independent assessment of the committee's decision and will be given $5000 to cover those costs.

If they are still unsatisfied they can bring it up with the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), which will waive its usual time or monetary claims limits for this case.

If the EU is not effective, ASIC has the ability to imposing conditions on Macquaries Australian Financial Services licence with Kell stating ASIC was prepared to go to court to enforce the EU.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

8 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

4 days 13 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 2 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 4 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 days 11 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

2 days 14 hours ago