ASIC hard talk backed up with action
The former director of a Queensland-based early release superannuation scheme has appeared in the Brisbane Magistrates Court on 21 charges of fraud brought by an Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) investigation.
The case, which ASIC alleges involves $437,688 of prematurely released superannuation assets, coincides with the peak regulator stepping up its crackdown on schemes that illegally allow members to access their retirement savings.
Yesterday ASIC reconfirmed its campaign against illegal early release super schemes by announcing a nationwide campaign with the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).
Meanwhile, the 21 charges of fraud in this case are directed at former Comcash Australasia director Richard Clayton Sharland, who was also banned along with Comcash agent Michael John Muckan back in June for operating an unregistered investment schemes and also acting without a valid Australian Financial Services Licence.
In this instance, ASIC alleges Sharland gained an advantage for Self Managed Capital Australia [a name he also operated under] at the expense of the-self managed superannuation funds that invested funds with the group.
The matter has been adjourned for mention to October 15.
Earlier this year, ASIC obtained orders winding-up any schemes operated under the names of Comcash Australasia or SMC Corporation, or similar names.
At the time the Queensland Supreme Court ordered that Sharland and Muckan be permanently restrained from promoting or operating any Comcash managed investment schemes, or from providing any financial services in relation to superannuation interests.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
