ASIC grants class action relief
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has moved to create transitional relief for lawyers and litigation funders involved in funded class actions.
The transitional relief will allow action against groups including failed agribusiness manager Great Southern to continue without disruption until at least the middle of next year.
Last month a Federal Court ruling decision found that class action being funded against Brookfield Multiplex fell within the definition of a managed investment scheme (MIS) under the Corporations Act.
The finding put at risk a number of class actions currently in play. If ASIC enforces the Federal Court finding, funded class actions would need to meet the various requirements of an MIS.
This would include appointing an Australian Financial Services Licensee as the responsible entity of the scheme, preparing a Product Disclosure Statement for the scheme and provide ongoing disclosure to scheme members, among other requirements.
ASIC said the relief would apply until June 30, 2010, during which time ASIC and the Government would “consider and consult on how funded class actions should be regulated under the [Corporations] Act in future”.
“Depending on the outcome of that process, existing class actions may need to be restructured to meet the requirements of the Act by the end of the relief period,” a statement from ASIC said.
Relief will be granted based on individual applications from lawyers and litigation funders involved in class actions that were commenced before November 4 this year. Class actions commenced after that date will be considered separately.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
