ASIC gets serious on conflict of interest

director ASIC national australia bank peter kell financial planners

1 February 2001
| By Kate Kachor |

ASIC has signalled it is getting serious about financial planners who have a conflict of interest by charging and convicting a former National Australia Bank (NAB) financial adviser

Paul John Borella of Elsternwich Victoria was convicted after pleading guilty to a breach of the Corporations Law section 849 when he failed to disclose his own financial interests in an investment he recommended to his clients.

Section 849 prohibits advisers from making recommendations to consumers about investments in which the adviser has an interest, without disclosing that conflict of interest.

The Melbourne magistrates' Court has placed Borella on a three-year good behaviour bond and ordered him to pay $5,000 plus costs.

The court heard that between 1996 and 1999 Borella advised eight clients, the majority of whom were retirees, to invest in Chatham Finance, a company in which he was a director and shareholder.

The investment was not authorised by the NAB, from which Borella held a proper authority.

Chatham Finance was involved in a number of schemes including a debt factoring arrangement and horse racing industry magazine. All of the company's ventures failed, with a loss to the eight investors of about $235,000.

NAB brought the matter to ASIC's attention, provided ASIC with ongoing assistance during the investigation and arranged full compensation for the losses sustained by Borella's clients.

This conviction follows on from ASIC banning Borella for five years from acting as a representative of a dealer and an investment advisor last October.

ASIC's director of the office of consumer protection, Peter Kell, says the conviction and banning demonstrated ASIC's determination to protect the public from advisers who fail to meet high advisory standards.

Kell says this first-ever conflict of interest conviction reflects ASIC's ability and willingness to ensure that investment advisers do not abuse their position of trust.

He says investors have a legitimate right to expect that their interests will always come first and that their adviser will act honestly and provide advice which is only in their best interests.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 5 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The difference between a Record of Advice and Statement of Advice is the crux of the FSCP’s latest determination against a relevant provider. ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS