ASIC focus on stockbroker advice
Stockbrokers and investment advisers have found themselves in the cross-hairs of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) which has used its latest Market Supervision Report to raise questions about the provision of general and personal advice.
The report, released by ASIC yesterday, pointed to the regulator having serious concerns about the type of advice being provided in the sector.
"We are concerned about the high proportion of general advice compared to personal advice, particularly by full-service brokers," the report said. "We intend to focus more efforts on reviewing the provision of advice by market participants, whether it is being categorised correctly as personal or general advice, and whether the relevant obligations are complied with appropriately."
The report said ASIC's scrutiny might include a focus on management oversight and adviser training.
"To date, our compliance reviews have identified deficiencies with the provision of personal advice and the requirement to provide a clear, concise and effective Statement of Advice (SOA)," it said. "For example, we identified market participants that had not provided sufficient information to clients regarding the basis on which the advice was given—suggesting that inadequate consideration may have been given to clients' circumstances, goals and objectives."
The report said ASIC was also continuing to focus on instances of unauthorised discretionary trading.
"For market participants with licence authorisations to conduct managed discretionary trading, we reviewed their processes to ensure compliance with the relevant requirements. In some instances, additional guidance was provided to ensure that participants' obligations were met," it said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025 with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
