ASIC focus on stockbroker advice
Stockbrokers and investment advisers have found themselves in the cross-hairs of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) which has used its latest Market Supervision Report to raise questions about the provision of general and personal advice.
The report, released by ASIC yesterday, pointed to the regulator having serious concerns about the type of advice being provided in the sector.
"We are concerned about the high proportion of general advice compared to personal advice, particularly by full-service brokers," the report said. "We intend to focus more efforts on reviewing the provision of advice by market participants, whether it is being categorised correctly as personal or general advice, and whether the relevant obligations are complied with appropriately."
The report said ASIC's scrutiny might include a focus on management oversight and adviser training.
"To date, our compliance reviews have identified deficiencies with the provision of personal advice and the requirement to provide a clear, concise and effective Statement of Advice (SOA)," it said. "For example, we identified market participants that had not provided sufficient information to clients regarding the basis on which the advice was given—suggesting that inadequate consideration may have been given to clients' circumstances, goals and objectives."
The report said ASIC was also continuing to focus on instances of unauthorised discretionary trading.
"For market participants with licence authorisations to conduct managed discretionary trading, we reviewed their processes to ensure compliance with the relevant requirements. In some instances, additional guidance was provided to ensure that participants' obligations were met," it said.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
