ASIC finds asset consultant fee structures conflicted
The financial services regulator has identified conflicts of interest present in asset consultant business models, which it said needed to be managed properly.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Commissioner Greg Tanzer said conflicts included fee structures based on preferring services, in-house funds and other products of related parties of the asset consultant.
In some circumstances, asset consultants had to recommend products to multiple clients where capacity to participate in these products might be limited, Tanzer said.
"Asset consultants provide advice to both superannuation trustees and responsible entities and are integral to the investment decisions made by these entities," he said, adding that the overall findings were generally positive.
"The asset consultants we spoke to demonstrated an awareness of, and compliance commitment to, their contractual and licensee obligations," Tanzer said.
ASIC also found a growing trend towards in-house for some or all investment management functions, with the sector also seeing a decrease in clients due to merger and consolidation activity.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
