ASIC concerned about institutional ownership

australian securities and investments commission australian financial services compliance financial planning ASIC financial advice

31 July 2013
| By Milana Pokrajac |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released a report in which it expressed concerns about the number of some of the largest financial advice groups being owned by product issuers. 

ASIC has released its 'Review of financial advice industry practice: Phase 2’, which was based on a questionnaire sent to the top 21 to 50 Australian Financial Services Licensees (AFSLs). 

“We observed that around half the licensees were either wholly owned or majority owned by a product issuer,” ASIC stated in the report. 

“We also observed that the majority of licensees’ income was received from product issuers. This may give rise to  both potential and actual conflicts of interest, especially where advisers  recommend products issued by related parties.” 

Management of such conflicts of interest remains a critical risk that requires ongoing attention from licensees, the regulator added. 

Another risk ASIC identified was product concentration, saying any product failure would have a much greater impact on licensees whose product  recommendations are concentrated into a small number of products. 

“Licensees should consider whether excessive product concentration represents a risk to their business, and how this risk can best be managed,” ASIC recommended. 

The regulator expressed these concerns only days after it was reported ASIC did not have particular concerns about institutional ownership, claiming those conflicts of interests were so far well managed. 

ASIC’s report Phase 1, which was released in 2011 and based on a survey sent to the 20 largest dealer groups in the country. 

The most reported high-impact risk to the businessidentified by the top 21 to 50 licensees was non-compliance with legislation, whereas the most reported high-probability risk was the provision of inappropriate advice, the regulator found.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 6 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

6 days 18 hours ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

4 days 12 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS