ASIC concerned about institutional ownership
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released a report in which it expressed concerns about the number of some of the largest financial advice groups being owned by product issuers.
ASIC has released its 'Review of financial advice industry practice: Phase 2’, which was based on a questionnaire sent to the top 21 to 50 Australian Financial Services Licensees (AFSLs).
“We observed that around half the licensees were either wholly owned or majority owned by a product issuer,” ASIC stated in the report.
“We also observed that the majority of licensees’ income was received from product issuers. This may give rise to both potential and actual conflicts of interest, especially where advisers recommend products issued by related parties.”
Management of such conflicts of interest remains a critical risk that requires ongoing attention from licensees, the regulator added.
Another risk ASIC identified was product concentration, saying any product failure would have a much greater impact on licensees whose product recommendations are concentrated into a small number of products.
“Licensees should consider whether excessive product concentration represents a risk to their business, and how this risk can best be managed,” ASIC recommended.
The regulator expressed these concerns only days after it was reported ASIC did not have particular concerns about institutional ownership, claiming those conflicts of interests were so far well managed.
ASIC’s report Phase 1, which was released in 2011 and based on a survey sent to the 20 largest dealer groups in the country.
The most reported high-impact risk to the businessidentified by the top 21 to 50 licensees was non-compliance with legislation, whereas the most reported high-probability risk was the provision of inappropriate advice, the regulator found.
Recommended for you
A financial advice firm has been penalised $11 million in the Federal Court for providing ‘cookie cutter advice’ to its clients and breaching conflicted remuneration rules.
Insignia Financial has experienced total quarterly net outflows of $1.8 billion as a result of client rebalancing, while its multi-asset flows halved from the prior quarter.
Prime Financial is looking to shed its “sleeping giant” reputation with larger M&A transactions going forward, having agreed to acquire research firm Lincoln Indicators.
An affiliate of Pinnacle Investment Management has expanded its reach with a London office as the fund manager seeks to grow its overseas distribution into the UK and Europe.
