ASIC clarifies adviser record keeping duties
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d414/9d414fe934508812b03b8f52476007673638d0b7" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d414/9d414fe934508812b03b8f52476007673638d0b7" alt="image"
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has sought to clarify financial advisers' record keeping obligations by amending Class Order 14/923 ‘Record-keeping obligations for Australian financial services licensees [AFSLs] when giving personal advice'.
The amendments clarified beyond doubt that AFSLs must have access to records for the period of time required to keep the records, even if a person other than the licensee stored the records.
The amendments also instructed authorised representatives who were advisers that they must keep records and give the records to their authorising licensee if the licensee requested the records in order to comply with financial services laws.
While the amendments to licensee obligations clarified rather than amend obligations, ASIC said it would still take a facilitative compliance approach for the first six months in order to ensure advice licensees had access to records as it recognised some licensees would need to change their systems to comply with the class order.
"Our facilitative compliance approach applies where advice licensees make a good-faith attempt to comply with the obligation but are unable to do so because of, for example, the need to make systems changes," ASIC said.
Deputy chairman, Peter Kell, said advice licensees were responsible for the advice given by their authorised representatives and should have the means to monitor them.
"Consumers should have trust and confidence that advice licensees have access to their representatives' records so they can monitor the advice given by their representatives and remediate consumers if something goes wrong," Kell said.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.