ASIC challenged on mislabelling law-breakers as ‘financial advisers’
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has been challenged to explain why it describes financial planning law-breakers as “financial advisers” when they are not.
The challenge was mounted by NSW Liberal back-bencher, Jason Falinski who asked ASIC to explain why a person who was not a financial adviser and who had not been included on the Financial Adviser Register (FAR) was being described as a “financial advisor” in an ASIC media release.
Falinski said he was referring to an ASIC media release issued on 5 November under the headline “Former financial advisor convicted and fined $30,000 for dishonest conduct”.
The ASIC media release said Mark Damion Kawecki, of Frankston, Victoria, had been convicted and fined $30,000 in the Melbourne County Court for engaging in dishonest conduct related to attempts to artificially satisfy the minimum spread requirement for companies seeking to be admitted to the ASX.
Falinski said that Kawecki was not a financial adviser and he wanted to know why ASIC was choosing to describe him that way.
“He is not a financial adviser and describing him as a financial adviser is not going to instil some necessary confidence in the financial planning industry,” he said.
ASIC commissioner, Danielle Press took Falinski’s question on notice, undertaking to find out why Kawecki had been described as a financial adviser if he was not one.’
Recommended for you
Despite the year almost at an end, advisers have been considerably active in licensee switching this week while the profession has reported a slight uptick in numbers.
AMP has agreed in principle to settle an advice and insurance class action that commenced in 2020 related to historic commission payment activity.
BT has kicked off its second annual Career Pathways Program in partnership with Striver, almost doubling its intake from the inaugural program last year.
Kaplan has launched a six-week intensive program to start in January, targeting advisers who are unlikely to meet the education deadline but intend to return to the profession once they do.
