ASIC chairman maintains focus on institutional advice
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has used its annual report tabled in Parliament, to repeat that it remains focused on addressing the delivery of poor financial advice, particularly with respect to large, vertically-integrated institutions.
ASIC chairman, Greg Medcraft pointed to the growth in superannuation savings as being the key driver for the structural change currently testing the regulatory environment. He noted that ASIC is responsible for regulating many of the financial products in which superannuation funds invest "and the gatekeepers that manage and advise on super".
"The spread of market-based financing, driven by growth in super, an ageing population and an evolving funds management industry, impacts our work," he said.
"We are meeting this challenge by stepping up our surveillances, responding where clients are getting poor-quality financial advice, and addressing incentives and poor risk management, particularly in large, vertically-integrated institutions."
Medcraft said that ASIC had set up a special project to focus on the conduct of large financial advice firms, with some investigations ongoing.
"In 2014—15, 14 individuals were permanently banned from providing financial advice, and a further 23 individuals were banned or agreed to stay out of the industry for shorter periods of time," he said. "We also conducted 321 funds management surveillances, including reviewing risk management practises."
Elsewhere in the annual report, Medcraft reinforced the regulator's desire to move to an industry funding model — something he claimed would create greater certainty and lead to better regulatory outcomes.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
