ASIC campaign makes waves
|
|
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) proposed investor education campaign, ‘Swimming between the Flags’, is set to receive a mixed reception from planners.
The campaign, tentatively scheduled for launch later this year, classifies some financial products as ‘within the flags’, and therefore safer for consumers.
Bank deposits, superannuation, blue chip shares, ‘vanilla’ managed funds and products with low risks or independent professional advice are deemed ‘within the flags’.
Financial Planning Association (FPA) chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said the campaign had “some merit” because ASIC has placed financial advice between the flags.
“By doing so the regulator is effectively acknowledging the role of planners and acknowledging it as a valuable activity, which is to be welcomed.”
Bloch said the “only real concern” the FPA would have with the campaign is with the criteria ASIC uses to decide which products are between the flags and which are not.
Capricorn Investment Partners director Ray Griffin described the campaign as “counter productive to the ongoing efforts of planners to educate clients on the long-term benefits of growth assets, despite the carnage of the last two years”.
Flagging designated investment products and sectors in a public campaign would “not necessarily quarantine consumers from losses”, he said.
“I can easily mount a counter argument that being invested all your life in bank term deposits — which get a between the flags rating from ASIC — can be extraordinarily risky.”
Shadforth Financial Group principal, private client adviser, David Haintz said the campaign was “correct in principle” but felt that “consumers who take advice should have no need for it”.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025 with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
