ASIC bans binary option sales to retail clients
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has made a product intervention order banning the issue and distribution of binary options to retail clients, with effect from 3 May, 2021.
ASIC said binary options had “resulted in and are likely to result in significant detriment to retail clients”.
The binary options were found to have been likely to result in cumulative losses to retail clients over time because of their product characteristics:
- The ‘all or nothing’ payoff structure, where one of the two possible outcomes for a binary option contract is that the retail client will lose their entire investment amount;
- Short contract duration (the average contract duration of binary options traded with one provider was less than six minutes); and
- Negative expected returns (that is, the present value of the expected payoff for a binary option contract is lower than the initial investment)
Additionally, binary options were found to have been incompatible with investment or risk management use by retail clients.
ASIC estimated that retail clients’ net losses from trading binary options stood at around $490 million in 2018, however the size of the market in Australia since then reduced significantly after it had issued a warning in April 2019 against providing unlicensed or unauthorised services to clients located in several foreign jurisdictions.
According to the corporate regulator, Australian retail clients were estimated to have made net losses of over $6.7 million in 2019.
The order would remain in force for 18 months, after which it may be extended or made permanent. Civil and criminal penalties would apply to contraventions of the product intervention order.
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
