ASIC approach queried

financial-services-industry/financial-advisers/fund-managers/cent/money-management/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

20 January 2006
| By Darin Tyson-Chan |

A survey of the financial services industry conducted by Money Management has revealed 50.3 per cent of financial advisers believe the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) enforcement actions regarding choice of fund are over the top.

ASIC has made its regulatory presence felt in the superannuation choice of fund environment with exercises such as super switching surveillance and a current shadow shopper campaign.

The results also showed 41.7 per cent of advisers thought ASIC’s approach was appropriate, while only 7.9 per cent felt the organisation’s attitude towards super choice regulation was not hard enough.

One respondent indicated the regulator’s actions might actually lead to a situation where only wealthy clients were looked after. This planner warned: “The incredible amount of extra time having to be taken by advisers to determine the information on the previous fund[s], often unavailable, means that the good and painstaking advisers will not be willing to spend this time on small and even medium sized clients for whom they will not be adequately remunerated, given the ASIC focus on procedural liability.”

It was also suggested ASIC’s crackdown was a waste of time with the comment “you cannot legislate against the bad, immoral or uncaring adviser”.

However, Charter Financial Planning authorised representative Robert Tomasello said he had been impressed by ASIC’s increasingly “commonsense” approach.

“The whole thing is getting a lot better. It’s getting to the point where people do have faith in financial advice and that’s good. We still have a lot of things to clean up in the industry no doubt to be called totally professional, but as long as we keep aiming for the betterment of the industry with clients, that’s great.”

Some sentiment subscribed to the view that ASIC’s actions were too soft centred on the continued presence of commission-based advice. One adviser said: “Until commission-based advice goes, the industry will not move forward.”

Fund managers on the whole were more accepting of the regulatory body’s methods with 58.8 per cent of those who took part in the survey thinking the enforcement approach to date had been appropriate. The study also revealed 23.5 per cent of fund managers thought ASIC’s actions were too tough, with 17.6 per cent feeling they were not tough enough.

The Money Management survey was conducted in late 2005 and received responses from around 170 financial services industry participants, with the majority being fund managers and financial advisers.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

2 days 7 hours ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

4 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND