ASIC to appeal Westpac responsible lending decision
The corporate watchdog has appealed with the Full Federal Court of Australia against the decision regarding allegations against Westpac Banking Corporation for contraventions of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Credit Act).
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said the court’s decision created uncertainty as to what was required for a lender to comply with its assessment obligation.
ASIC commissioner Sean Hughes said ASIC did not regard the decision as consistent with the legislative intention of the responsible lending regime.
“The Credit Act imposes a number of legal obligations on credit providers, including the need to make reasonable inquiries about a borrower’s financial circumstances, verifying information obtained from borrowers and making an assessment of whether a loan is unsuitable for the borrower,” he said.
Last month, the Federal Court found Westpac had not breached the responsible lending provisions of the Credit Act and decided that a lender “may do what it wants in the assessment process”.
At the time, Hughes said ASIC took on the case because of the need for judicial clarification of a cornerstone legal obligation on lenders and “this is why ASIC refers to this case as a ‘test case’”.
ASIC had alleged that during December 2011 and March 2015, Westpac failed to properly assess whether borrowers could meet their repayment obligations before entering into home loan contracts.
Recommended for you
Advice licensee WT Financial has announced a 50/50 joint venture with the Australian subsidiary of a US financial advice investor.
Wealth managers will need to reach aggressive short-term goals to grow their assets under management, according to Natixis Investment Managers, but Asia-Pacific has the lowest expectations on their future growth.
With a rising number of licensees opting for bespoke managed accounts, a panel of experts has shared what firms need to know before going down the custom route.
ASIC has banned a Queensland adviser from providing financial services for five years after failing to provide appropriate advice that was in the best interest of his clients.
