ASIC to appeal Westpac responsible lending decision
The corporate watchdog has appealed with the Full Federal Court of Australia against the decision regarding allegations against Westpac Banking Corporation for contraventions of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Credit Act).
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said the court’s decision created uncertainty as to what was required for a lender to comply with its assessment obligation.
ASIC commissioner Sean Hughes said ASIC did not regard the decision as consistent with the legislative intention of the responsible lending regime.
“The Credit Act imposes a number of legal obligations on credit providers, including the need to make reasonable inquiries about a borrower’s financial circumstances, verifying information obtained from borrowers and making an assessment of whether a loan is unsuitable for the borrower,” he said.
Last month, the Federal Court found Westpac had not breached the responsible lending provisions of the Credit Act and decided that a lender “may do what it wants in the assessment process”.
At the time, Hughes said ASIC took on the case because of the need for judicial clarification of a cornerstone legal obligation on lenders and “this is why ASIC refers to this case as a ‘test case’”.
ASIC had alleged that during December 2011 and March 2015, Westpac failed to properly assess whether borrowers could meet their repayment obligations before entering into home loan contracts.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
