ASIC admits to Storm Financial complaints

ASIC/storm-financial/disclosure/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/chairman/

26 February 2009
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has admitted in a parliamentary hearing that it received four complaints relating to Storm Financial between 2006 and 2007.

Nationals Senator for New South Wales John Williams said ASIC yesterday admitted it investigated Storm over what it called ‘minor complaints’ but did not consider the group a ‘smoking gun’.

The admission was made during discussions at the Senate Standing Committee on Economics, which included ASIC chairman Tony D’Aloisio and the Minister for Superannuation and Corporate Law, Senator Nick Sherry.

In ASIC's statement to the committee, D'Aloisio said the regulator is "now in the process of reviewing its contacts with Storm and complaints to ASIC about Storm".

"What we can say at this stage is that, prior to 2006, there were a number of communications between ASIC, Storm and its officers based on routine ASIC surveillance in Queensland of financial planners," the ASIC statement said.

But ASIC said any issues raised during the surveillance activities, "generally about disclosure issues", were resolved at the time.

"During 2006-07 ASIC received four complaints about Storm in relation to its Statements of Advice and fee levels," the statement said.

But ASIC argued that none of these complaints were from Storm clients and that the issues did not involve "any examination of Storm's advisory model or use of aggressive leverage".

Instead, the issues concerned disclosure and fees, ASIC said, and were "addressed by Storm at the time".

ASIC said it then received a "number of complaints" from investors on October 31, 2008, which it then reviewed and followed up with various enquiries.

It was in October last year that Challenger, one of the groups associated with Storm, began selling down stocks of Storm Financial clients facing margin calls.

In the hearing, Senator Williams queried why Storm Financial investors with margin loans spiralling into negative equity were “not alerted at a point where they may have been able to manage their debt, rather than being told by the banks their shares had been sold and they still faced a large debt”.

ASIC said responsibility for monitoring the portfolio lay with the investor, Storm Financial and the banks involved.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 2 weeks ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

3 days 14 hours ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

1 week 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND