ASIC admits to Storm Financial complaints

ASIC storm financial disclosure australian securities and investments commission chairman

26 February 2009
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has admitted in a parliamentary hearing that it received four complaints relating to Storm Financial between 2006 and 2007.

Nationals Senator for New South Wales John Williams said ASIC yesterday admitted it investigated Storm over what it called ‘minor complaints’ but did not consider the group a ‘smoking gun’.

The admission was made during discussions at the Senate Standing Committee on Economics, which included ASIC chairman Tony D’Aloisio and the Minister for Superannuation and Corporate Law, Senator Nick Sherry.

In ASIC's statement to the committee, D'Aloisio said the regulator is "now in the process of reviewing its contacts with Storm and complaints to ASIC about Storm".

"What we can say at this stage is that, prior to 2006, there were a number of communications between ASIC, Storm and its officers based on routine ASIC surveillance in Queensland of financial planners," the ASIC statement said.

But ASIC said any issues raised during the surveillance activities, "generally about disclosure issues", were resolved at the time.

"During 2006-07 ASIC received four complaints about Storm in relation to its Statements of Advice and fee levels," the statement said.

But ASIC argued that none of these complaints were from Storm clients and that the issues did not involve "any examination of Storm's advisory model or use of aggressive leverage".

Instead, the issues concerned disclosure and fees, ASIC said, and were "addressed by Storm at the time".

ASIC said it then received a "number of complaints" from investors on October 31, 2008, which it then reviewed and followed up with various enquiries.

It was in October last year that Challenger, one of the groups associated with Storm, began selling down stocks of Storm Financial clients facing margin calls.

In the hearing, Senator Williams queried why Storm Financial investors with margin loans spiralling into negative equity were “not alerted at a point where they may have been able to manage their debt, rather than being told by the banks their shares had been sold and they still faced a large debt”.

ASIC said responsibility for monitoring the portfolio lay with the investor, Storm Financial and the banks involved.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

14 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

2 weeks 5 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia's latest interest rate announcement has left punters disheartened on Melbourne Cup Day....

1 week 6 days ago

The Federal Court has given a verdict on ASIC’s case against Dixon Advisory director Paul Ryan which had alleged he breached his director duties....

1 week 5 days ago