ASIC action challenged

financial services group financial planning services financial services industry australian securities and investments commission administrative appeals tribunal

24 September 2007
| By Mike Taylor |

The Australian Financial Services Group (AFS) has vowed to support a Sydney financial planner, Michael Parker, in an Administrative Appeals Tribunal appeal against a banning order imposed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

AFS has expressed disappointment at the process followed by ASIC and has claimed the penalty imposed on Parker is disproportionate.

AFS has predicated its support for Parker on the basis that no client suffered loss as a result of Parker’s actions and that, indeed, some clients may have benefited from lower costs.

In a statement issued late last week, AFS said it acknowledged and supported the need for a robust and strong industry and the role of the regulator in achieving this outcome, but was disappointed by the decision to place a banning order on Parker.

ASIC banned Parker, of Sydney suburb Castle Hill, from working in the financial services industry for two years.

Parker was an authorised representative of AFS and provided financial planning services through Associated Professional Advisers Pty Ltd. Parker worked for Associated Professional Advisers, based in Hornsby, NSW, from July 3, 2006.

Parker was banned after an ASIC investigation found that towards the end of September 2006 he sent 90 clients an identical Statement of Advice recommending the rollover of their superannuation savings to a fund in which AFS Limited had a financial interest.

The regulator found that Parker did so without first determining and making enquiries in relation to each client’s personal circumstances or considering whether his advice to each client was appropriate.

The AFS statement said that it believed that no client had suffered loss and that some clients would have benefited from lower costs.

“AFS also understands that the appeal will question ASIC’s assertion that Parker did not first make enquiries in relation to client’s personal circumstances or consider whether the advice to each client was appropriate.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

6 days 3 hours ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

1 day 17 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

22 hours ago