ASIC acknowledges conflicts in vertical integration

peter-kell/ASIC/compliance/financial-planning/professional-indemnity-insurance/financial-planners/parliamentary-joint-committee/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

16 September 2014
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has acknowledged that the vertical integration of financial services organisations gives rise to conflicts of interest because of the cohabitation of product manufacturers, distributors and advisers.

However ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell has also pointed to benefits flowing from a vertically integrated model, not least the ability of major, vertically integrated organisations to provide compensation when things go on.

At the same time, ASIC chairman, Greg Medcraft admitted that there were limitations to the effectiveness of professional indemnity insurance when it came to ensuring investors were compensated for bad advice.

Giving evidence before a Parliamentary Joint Committee, Kell said there were positives and negatives with respect to vertical integration.

"In terms of changes if we were to move away from that model: that would help address one of the issues that continually comes up around vertical integration, and that is the conflicts of interest that are inherent in a model where you have product manufacturers, distributors and advisers," he said.

"On the other hand, there are some benefits to vertical integration as well. I mentioned earlier, for example, the number of unpaid disputes at FOS (Financial Ombudsmand Service) involving financial planners. None of them involve vertically integrated companies, because they have the money behind them to ultimately pay if something goes wrong," Kell said.

He said that if changes were to be considered it might therefore be necessary to consider remediation of the compensation framework, something which prompted Medcraft to suggest that PI insurance had "some distinct limitations".

"PI…is at its weakest when it is most needed—that is, when you have multiple claims coming through at a single point in time," he said.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months ago

Entireti has unveiled the new name for the AMP financial advice businesses that it acquired last year....

4 weeks ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

2 weeks 6 days ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

1 week 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS