ASIC acknowledges conflicts in vertical integration
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has acknowledged that the vertical integration of financial services organisations gives rise to conflicts of interest because of the cohabitation of product manufacturers, distributors and advisers.
However ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell has also pointed to benefits flowing from a vertically integrated model, not least the ability of major, vertically integrated organisations to provide compensation when things go on.
At the same time, ASIC chairman, Greg Medcraft admitted that there were limitations to the effectiveness of professional indemnity insurance when it came to ensuring investors were compensated for bad advice.
Giving evidence before a Parliamentary Joint Committee, Kell said there were positives and negatives with respect to vertical integration.
"In terms of changes if we were to move away from that model: that would help address one of the issues that continually comes up around vertical integration, and that is the conflicts of interest that are inherent in a model where you have product manufacturers, distributors and advisers," he said.
"On the other hand, there are some benefits to vertical integration as well. I mentioned earlier, for example, the number of unpaid disputes at FOS (Financial Ombudsmand Service) involving financial planners. None of them involve vertically integrated companies, because they have the money behind them to ultimately pay if something goes wrong," Kell said.
He said that if changes were to be considered it might therefore be necessary to consider remediation of the compensation framework, something which prompted Medcraft to suggest that PI insurance had "some distinct limitations".
"PI…is at its weakest when it is most needed—that is, when you have multiple claims coming through at a single point in time," he said.
Recommended for you
A financial advice firm has been penalised $11 million in the Federal Court for providing ‘cookie cutter advice’ to its clients and breaching conflicted remuneration rules.
Insignia Financial has experienced total quarterly net outflows of $1.8 billion as a result of client rebalancing, while its multi-asset flows halved from the prior quarter.
Prime Financial is looking to shed its “sleeping giant” reputation with larger M&A transactions going forward, having agreed to acquire research firm Lincoln Indicators.
An affiliate of Pinnacle Investment Management has expanded its reach with a London office as the fund manager seeks to grow its overseas distribution into the UK and Europe.
