ASIC accepts EU from advice firm
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) accepted an enforceable undertaking (EU) from a Sydney-based financial services company for providing inappropriate and difficult to understand self-managed super fund (SMSF) advice.
The EU came after ASIC investigated the Mascot based firm, Ascentiv Group, and its sole director, Chris Pappas.
It found that they allegedly were not giving best interest advice to their clients, and advised clients to establish SMSFs when it was not appropriate.
The corporate regulator said Ascentiv's statements of advice (SOA) were "very lengthy and difficult to understand, making it difficult for their Ascentiv's clients to make informed decisions about the advice provided to them".
ASIC also established that Ascentiv did not manage their conflicts of interest, monitor and supervise its representatives, or ensure their advisers were "adequately trained and competent" in providing SMSF advice.
Under the EU, Ascentiv has agreed to cancelled its Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) and write to some of its existing clients to inform them of the EU and the clients' right to dispute resolution, ASIC said.
ASIC deputy chairman, Peter Kell, said: "Self-managed super funds are not appropriate for everyone. It is important that the advice provided to clients of financial advisers is appropriate for those individuals' needs and circumstances".
"ASIC further expects that AFS licensees that provide SMSF advice to adequately monitor their representatives and have processes which lead to the provision of high quality SMSF advice."
ASIC said Ascentiv and Pappas were cooperating throughout the process.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
