ASFA mounts defence of dividend imputation
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has used a submission to the Henry Tax Review to mount a strong defence of the existing dividend imputation system in the face of continuing media speculation that it may be abolished.
The submission argues that the dividend imputation system is of major importance to the superannuation industry and suggests that no compelling case has yet been made for its removal.
It said that it believed the current dividend imputation system provided a fair outcome for all shareholders and was a major reason Australian superannuation funds invested a substantial proportion of their assets in Australian companies.
The submission said that in the absence of a dividend imputation system, company profits in Australia would be subject to double taxation and the absence of double taxation improved the economic return from equity investments and removed an impediment to investing in Australian equities.
“Australians are continually encouraged to invest in superannuation in order to provide for their retirement,” the submission said. “In addition, there is much concern and discussion regarding the level of financial adequacy for retirees.”
“Removing the dividend imputation system, and thus the capacity for the refund of excess franking, would provide a disincentive to making discretionary superannuation contributions,” it said. “It would also have a negative impact on the financial adequacy of retirees.”
The submission said that major superannuation funds currently provided a significant source of long-term capital funding to Australian companies and that removal of the dividend imputation regime could see a reduction in this source of long-term capital as funds looked to invest offshore.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
