ASFA calls for standardised labelling of financial products
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has called for standardised labelling of financial products to provide retail investors with a better understanding of the risks of investing.
ASFA chief executive Pauline Vamos said clarity around the risk of losing money was needed to prevent large numbers of retail consumers, particularly in superannuation and retirement, from “dissolving their super funds through poor investment”.
“Ultimately, what we need is a move towards standard risk labelling for products,” she said. “This is a complex area, but one that is worthwhile pursuing.”
Vamos noted that a high-risk product currently under scrutiny by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) was contracts for difference (CFDs).
“CFDs are highly complicated products which require more detailed and visible labelling to alert potential investors to the risk of losing their money,” said Vamos, adding that ASIC’s initiative to improve the labelling and product disclosures on CFDs was a great start.
Referring to ASIC’s published warning about CFDs on its Super Guru website, Vamos said it was particularly appropriate for self-managed super fund (SMSF) trustees as research revealed they were confused about the risks involved in investing in CFDs.
Vamos added that while the Federal Government was looking at the definitions of retail, sophisticated and wholesale investors, SMSF trustees still needed consumer protection despite having large balances and being inclined towards more sophisticated products.
Recommended for you
AZ NGA’s CEO has unpacked how its recent $345 million debt facility from Barings will accelerate its advice network’s growth ambitions, and allow its largest firms to access a greater source of funding.
Research by Colonial First State has found women are reluctant to make retirement preparations, despite 62 per cent saying they feel that they are unable to achieve a comfortable retirement.
Managed accounts saw net inflows of $14.3 billion in the six months to 31 December, according to the latest IMAP FUM census.
The increased bids for Insignia from Bain and CC Capital value the company at $3.3 billion, while there is still a possibility for competing bids from rival players such as Brookfield.
