ASFA calls for ASIC to adopt clearer approach

ASFA/government-and-regulation/ASIC/APRA/superannuation-industry/superannuation-funds/superannuation-complaints-tribunal/australian-prudential-regulation-authority/association-of-superannuation-funds/australian-financial-services/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

25 October 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has called for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to adopt a clearer approach to its consultation, supervision and enforcement of the superannuation sector. 

ASFA also called on ASIC to adopt a more collaborative approach, such as the prudential stance adopted by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), instead of the current approach of seeking rectification or enforcement after a regulatory breach has occurred. 

ASFA’s comments were made as part of its submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Economics into the performance of ASIC. ASFA also stated that the regulator’s interaction with the superannuation industry was confined to registration, reporting and enforcement. 

As a result of this limited engagement and post-event enforcement approach, ASFA claimed that “ASIC’s substantial powers appear to act as a disincentive to establishing collaborative relationships with industry”. 

“Given the degree of legislative change for Australian Financial Services and Australian Credit licensees, it would be helpful for licensees to have regular contact with an ASIC team akin to the APRA model for Registrable Superannuation Entities.” 

ASFA said the different regulatory approaches between ASIC and APRA reflect that the latter is a prudential regulator - but ASIC would be more effective and efficient by introducing specialised staff instead of allocating them to issues in its current “first cab off the rank” approach.  

While calling for greater collaboration with the superannuation industry, ASFA stated that ASIC should be functionally separated from Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT), with the latter established as a body in its own right. 

ASFA said the role of the SCT to determine claims or disputes was that of an independent tribunal with a judicial function and not an administrative or regulatory one. It said “a hallmark of tribunals is that they should operate, and importantly be perceived by consumers to be operating, on a truly independent, quasi-judicial basis”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 1 week ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

1 day 6 hours ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

2 weeks 2 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5