Are there code of ethics risks for advisers making retirement income recommendations?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2157e/2157e04b1f1a31d812bed7045e9e00793af6bcb5" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2157e/2157e04b1f1a31d812bed7045e9e00793af6bcb5" alt="image"
Companies with a heavy focus on annuities-based products are facing a challenge with financial advisers making clear that the likelihood of a prolonged low interest rate environment makes it difficult to build an annuities-based retirement income strategy.
What is more, there are questions around the types of recommendations advisers can make about such strategies in a prolonged low rate environment in light of the strictures of the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) code of ethics, particularly Standards 5 and 6.
The early results of a survey currently being conducted by Money Management ahead of its free Retirement Incomes Webinar on July 15 (sign up here) had revealed strong adviser concern around recommending annuities in the current environment – something which will be discussed by a panel of experts which will include the Australian Financial Complaints Authority’s (AFCA’s) ombudsman, Shail Singh.
Respondents to the survey were asked whether, given the likelihood of an extended period of low or even zero interest rates, they regarded annuities as remaining central to retirement income strategies. And their answers will concern annuities-focused business such as Challenger and AllianzRetire together with a number of industry superannuation funds who have made annuities a part of their member product offering.
The survey found that 80% of respondents were not currently regarding annuities as central to their discussions with clients around retirement incomes strategies.
But, at the same time, the survey made clear that the most frequent advice being provided to advisers to their clients who were approaching or had reached retirement was that they should hold to their strategies, avoid crystallising their loss and look to the long-term.
Interestingly, the survey revealed that the majority of advisers were not recommending that their clients necessarily stay longer in the workforce.
Asked whether they were recommending that those clients who could should defer their retirements, 60% of respondents answered no.
The Money Management retirement incomes webinar will an authoritative panel made up of:
- Andrew Lowe, Challenger
- John Maroney, SMSF Association
- Shail Singh, AFCA
- Shaune Egan, AMP
- Tim Dowling, Allianz Retire+
Advisers can participate in the continuing Retirement Incomes survey here.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.