Are penalties enough to get FFNS payments accelerated?

Deborah O’Neill australian securities and investments commission karen chester

1 December 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Only 30% of $5.3 billion of fee-for-no service remediation had been paid customers as at 30 June, 2021, and the corporate regulator believes its “strengthened” guidance will remove the last stumbling blocks from boards to get money back to customers.

Answering questions from during a parliamentary hearing from Labor senator Deborah O’Neill on fee-for-no-service remediation, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) deputy chair, Karen Chester said the regulator was trying to help accelerate some of the remediation programs.

“The biggest stumbling block to the speed has been the systemic under investment in the systems and data by the firms,” Chester said.

“We've given guidance to ensure that they know what to do in areas where the systems and the data are causing problems, and what the benefit of the doubt assumptions are, how far back to review, and expectations around locating and paying impacted customers.

“We're hoping with that guidance, which we're consulting on at the moment, will provide the confidence and speed that's required for those that fairly amounts to be repaid as quickly as possible.”

O’Neill said the lagging firms needed to be penalised as she was “sick and tired of big companies that have failed to invest in the proper resources in the back office to make sure they had detailed information”.

“Using that as an excuse to continue to block the payment that people have a right to expect and deserve, frankly, years ago now. Now that in my view, there should be a penalty.”

Chester said there were penalties under the Corporations Act’s section 912a and that the penalties went to consolidated revenue. She said the firms that had been penalised were “now on notice” and were not doing business in a way that was not efficient, honest, and fair.

“While these continues, even if penalties are raised, that gives more money to the government. For the people who were ripped off, they should have already got their money long ago and they are not getting any additional payment by this delay,” O’Neill said.

“The Government's got a business model where they're making money out of this being delayed. Now, I don't think they would have concocted it that way – I hate to think that they did.

“But the reality is, the longer this goes on the more money goes to the Government and the more people are going to die waiting for it. That is not a good system designed from my point of view.”

Chester noted that the deadlines to pay remediation were set by the boards of the entities and that the regulator hoped with its new guidance it would remove any of the last stumbling blocks in confidence and speed so the boards could get money back to consumers.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

1 day 7 hours ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months 1 week ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

3 weeks 4 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

2 weeks 4 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

2 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS