APRA seeks to broaden regulatory powers over conglomerates

APRA insurance compliance risk management life insurance

19 March 2010
| By Chris Kennedy |

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has released a discussion paper that seeks to dramatically broaden its supervisory mandate to cover diverse financial conglomerates, which it considers are currently not adequately supervised.

The discussion paper seeks to add a Level 3 supervisory framework to the existing Level 1 and Level 2 framework, which will extend the prudential regulator’s powers across a number of industries and businesses. APRA said the proposal is a response to the increased danger of a “supervisory blind spot” that might result from complex business structures and conglomerates.

“Hence, a narrow, standalone view of regulated entities is insufficient to obtain a full picture of the financial risks to which depositors and policy holders may be exposed,” APRA said in its discussion paper.

“Although membership of a conglomerate may provide benefits to APRA-regulated entities, it may also increase and change the risks they face. The more material a group’s activities outside of its primary industry, the greater the risk that an industry-focused supervisory regime will not appropriately detect or respond to risks associated with these activities, and the greater the danger of a supervisory ‘blind spot’ that may result in risks building up without adequate remediation.”

Under the existing model, the Level 1 framework concerns supervision that applies to all individual operating entities authorised by APRA, while Level 2 covers group supervision that applies to groups headed by an authorised deposit taking institution — as defined under the Banking Act 1959 — a general insurer or an authorised non operating holding company (Banking Act 1959, Insurance Act 1973 and Life Insurance Act 1995).

Under the proposal, Level 3 will cover group supervision of conglomerate groups containing APRA-regulated entities with material operations across more than one APRA-regulated industry and/or in unregulated entities.

“Group 3 supervision will involve not only assessing both capital adequacy and compliance with governance and risk management requirements, but also ensure that the structure of the group does not give rise to excessive unmitigated risks. Supervisions will take into account the individual structure and character of each group.”

APRA also said it might impose, on a case-by-case basis, additional requirements under the Level 3 framework, which might include additional capital, risk management or reporting requirements.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 6 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS