APRA research hammers retail costs

retail funds APRA chief executive

13 July 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

New Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) research has identified a wide disparity between the fees paid by retail superannuation funds and those paid by not-for-profit funds, suggesting that the retail fees reflect revenue generation rather than actual costs.

The research, undertaken by Kevin Liu and Bruce Arnold, was made public by APRA this week. It found that while using related parties to provide particular services is not, of itself, detrimental to fund members, “the trustees of retail funds pay significantly higher fees to related service providers”.

It said that, in contrast, the fees paid by trustees of not-for-profit funds to related parties were not significantly higher than those to independent service providers.

The Liu and Arnold research then went further, and said that the largest difference between not-for-profits and retail funds occurred with respect to administrative services where they had found “strikingly different fee models used in different contexts”. The research said that for independent administrators and not-for-profit related-party administrators the fees were predominantly related to the number of members in a fund whereas, by contrast, retail fund related-party administrators paid a large fixed fee plus a variable component based on assets under management.

“These different approaches result in the median fund paying $12.2 million in fees under the retail-related administrator, versus only $2.3 million to a service provider who was independent or not-for-profit-related,” it said.

The researchers suggested that the approach adopted by not-for-profit funds was designed to minimise the cost of delivering superannuation to the fund’s members, while the outsourcing by retail funds “does not appear to be intended to reduce members’ costs, but instead may constitute part of the revenue model for the retail superannuation product”.

Commenting on the research, Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees chief executive Fiona Reynolds said it suggested some retail funds had conflicted outsourcing arrangements.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

10 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

2 weeks 5 days ago

increased professionalism within the industry - shouldn't that say, FAR register almost halving in the last 24 months he...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia's latest interest rate announcement has left punters disheartened on Melbourne Cup Day....

1 week 6 days ago

The Federal Court has given a verdict on ASIC’s case against Dixon Advisory director Paul Ryan which had alleged he breached his director duties....

1 week 5 days ago