APRA research hammers retail costs

retail-funds/APRA/chief-executive/

13 July 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

New Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) research has identified a wide disparity between the fees paid by retail superannuation funds and those paid by not-for-profit funds, suggesting that the retail fees reflect revenue generation rather than actual costs.

The research, undertaken by Kevin Liu and Bruce Arnold, was made public by APRA this week. It found that while using related parties to provide particular services is not, of itself, detrimental to fund members, “the trustees of retail funds pay significantly higher fees to related service providers”.

It said that, in contrast, the fees paid by trustees of not-for-profit funds to related parties were not significantly higher than those to independent service providers.

The Liu and Arnold research then went further, and said that the largest difference between not-for-profits and retail funds occurred with respect to administrative services where they had found “strikingly different fee models used in different contexts”. The research said that for independent administrators and not-for-profit related-party administrators the fees were predominantly related to the number of members in a fund whereas, by contrast, retail fund related-party administrators paid a large fixed fee plus a variable component based on assets under management.

“These different approaches result in the median fund paying $12.2 million in fees under the retail-related administrator, versus only $2.3 million to a service provider who was independent or not-for-profit-related,” it said.

The researchers suggested that the approach adopted by not-for-profit funds was designed to minimise the cost of delivering superannuation to the fund’s members, while the outsourcing by retail funds “does not appear to be intended to reduce members’ costs, but instead may constitute part of the revenue model for the retail superannuation product”.

Commenting on the research, Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees chief executive Fiona Reynolds said it suggested some retail funds had conflicted outsourcing arrangements.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 2 weeks ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

2 days 14 hours ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

4 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND