APRA paying legal firms $3.5 million
Australia's superannuation regulator is paying three legal firms around $3.5 million as part of contractual arrangements around investigations into superannuation funds.
The figure has been revealed by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) as part of answers to questions on notice from Tasmanian Liberal Senator, David Bushby, during Senate Estimates.
Bushby had asked how many external legal contracts were in train in "relation to investigations of super fund matters, and the value of those contracts".
APRA responded that it currently had three external legal contracts valued at around $3.5 million.
Bushby had also asked APRA what would happen in the event of a superannuation fund losing a legal class action because of "false and misleading advertising based on overly optimistic 30-40 year projections of future returns".
"What would be the source/s of funds to meet such a contingency, and what would be APRA's advice to funds and trustees in relation to this matter?" the Senator asked.
APRA answered that if a Registrable Superannuation Entity (RSE) licensee was conducting the misleading advertising, it (APRA) would ordinarily refer the matter to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) because it related to disclosures made to fund members.
However, it said that in relation to the liability issue, most RSE licensees could be indemnified from the assets of the trust fund (subject to certain exceptions, such as when they have been dishonest, or intentionally or recklessly failed to exercise care and diligence, or been liable for a monetary penalty under a civil penalty order - ie, an ASIC fine).
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.
