APRA inquiry net captures former CBA executives

CBA/APRA/inquiry/

2 February 2018
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Former Commonwealth Bank (CBA) executives and board members have found themselves captured by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s (APRA’s) prudential inquiry into the bank with their decision-making having been placed under scrutiny.

APRA’s release of a carefully-worded progress report on the prudential inquiry has confirmed that it is looking at whether former and present executives were alive to issues within the big banking group and what action they ultimately decided to take.

Importantly, the inquiry panel has made clear that it is looking at remuneration structures and how they impacted on key decision-making.

The inquiry progress report said former executives and board members had already been questioned and that this was continuing.

“Interviews have been structured as general ‘fact finding’ interviews, as well as deep structured interviews to understand the organisational and cultural drivers of Board and management actions within CBA and whether particular factors are conflicting with sound risk management and compliance outcomes,” the update report said.

It said the Panel had conducted a number of these interviews, and intended to meet with all Directors and key decision-makers during the course of the Inquiry with other interviews being run by the project team . Other interviews are being run by the project team, which then briefs the Panel.

The update said the inquiry Panel was directing its attention to some particular issues that had emerged from the work it had conducted to date.

It said these issues included:

 

· Board (including Board Audit and Risk Committees) and senior executive responsiveness to emerging risk issues and diligence in overseeing the resolution of these issues;

 

· the influence on CBA’s culture of the Board and senior executives;

 

· the complexity of policies and decision-making processes within CBA;

 

· the prioritisation and execution of investment in risk systems;

 

· capabilities and accountabilities for risk management in the organisation, particularly for operational, compliance and reputational risk;

 

· the stature, maturity and resourcing of the compliance function;

 

· the responsiveness of remuneration to risk outcomes, adverse or positive.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 1 week ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

2 days 20 hours ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

2 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

3 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5