APRA getting tougher on securitisation rules
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has warned Australian banks, insurance companies and superannuation funds that it has become "considerably less tolerant" of their use of securitisation transactions.
APRA general manager policy, research and statistics Charles Littrell has used an address to the Australian Securitisation Forum this week to make clear the regulator's concern, but adding that APRA believes securitisation is "more useful than dangerous".
"But we have become considerably less tolerant of the over-complication that crept into this financial product," he said. "We also observe that some ADIs have developed the habit of following the letter, not the spirit, of the prudential requirements applicable to securitisation."
Littrell said APRA had undertaken a review of industry compliance with the requirements around securitisation and what it had found was not pleasing, with some in the market appearing to have adopted an approach of "what the rules allow" rather than "what is economically sensible".
"APRA regards the basic concessions in securitisation, the ability to remove all capital requirements on the underlying assets, and the permission to pledge assets, as extraordinary benefits," he said. "We do not propose to award these benefits to structures and issuers that do not merit them."
Littrell pointed to APRA next year carrying out a complete review of its arrangements around securitisation. It suggested that any reforms were likely to feature a simpler approach but with more supervisory flexibility.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
