APRA getting tougher on securitisation rules
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has warned Australian banks, insurance companies and superannuation funds that it has become "considerably less tolerant" of their use of securitisation transactions.
APRA general manager policy, research and statistics Charles Littrell has used an address to the Australian Securitisation Forum this week to make clear the regulator's concern, but adding that APRA believes securitisation is "more useful than dangerous".
"But we have become considerably less tolerant of the over-complication that crept into this financial product," he said. "We also observe that some ADIs have developed the habit of following the letter, not the spirit, of the prudential requirements applicable to securitisation."
Littrell said APRA had undertaken a review of industry compliance with the requirements around securitisation and what it had found was not pleasing, with some in the market appearing to have adopted an approach of "what the rules allow" rather than "what is economically sensible".
"APRA regards the basic concessions in securitisation, the ability to remove all capital requirements on the underlying assets, and the permission to pledge assets, as extraordinary benefits," he said. "We do not propose to award these benefits to structures and issuers that do not merit them."
Littrell pointed to APRA next year carrying out a complete review of its arrangements around securitisation. It suggested that any reforms were likely to feature a simpler approach but with more supervisory flexibility.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Net cash flow on AMP’s platforms saw a substantial jump in the last quarter to $740 million, while its new digital advice offering boosted flows to superannuation and investment.
Insignia Financial has provided an update on the status of its private equity bidders as an initial six-week due diligence period comes to an end.
A judge has detailed how individuals lent as much as $1.1 million each to former financial adviser Anthony Del Vecchio, only learning when they contacted his employer that nothing had ever been invested.
Having rejected the possibility of an IPO, Mason Stevens’ CEO details why the wealth platform went down the PE route and how it intends to accelerate its growth ambitions in financial advice.
