Another week of sharp adviser losses


Adviser numbers have fallen sharply for the second week in a row, experiencing a net change of -33, largely driven by licensees closing up shop due to having zero advisers, according to Wealth Data.
With a dozen licensees closing this week, the total closures over the last two weeks was 26, but smaller licensees may not have reported correctly due to being caught up in an Australian Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) review of the Financial Adviser Register.
“Hence the large number of licensees being reduced to zero advisers. Again, this week we saw more advisers being ceased with their exit date backdated into 2021,” Wealth Data founder, Colin Williams said.
The closure of 12 licensees accounted for 17 adviser losses was led by RSM Corporate down net of five, while AIA, Centrepoint and Pitcher Partners Brisbane were all down by a net of three. None of the advisers commenced elsewhere in the week.
Meanwhile, six licensee owners were down a net of two including Count, Fiducian, WT Financial and Insignia, while a long tail of 31 licensee owners fell a net of one, including Fitzpatricks, Fortnum, and Telstra Super.
Looking at switches, only seven advisers ceased and recommenced on the register this week.
In terms of growth, Australian Retirement Trust (merged entity of Sun Super and Q Super) increased advisers by net three, all under the Sunsuper licensee. Capstone was up by two, taking one adviser away from Count and reappointing a former adviser who had a break.
A tail of 19 licensee owners were up net one each including Shartru, Castleguard (Lifespan), ASVW Holdings and two new licensees starting with one adviser each.
Recommended for you
ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test.
Quarterly Wealth Data analysis has uncovered positive improvements in financial adviser numbers compared with losses in the prior corresponding period.
Holding portfolios that are too complex or personalised can be a detractor for acquirers of financial advice firms as they require too much effort to maintain post-acquisition.
As the financial advice profession continues to wait on further DBFO legislation, industry commentators have encouraged advisers to act now in driving practice efficiency.