Another annual fee for advisers

ASIC/far/fees/

20 April 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image image
expand image

Financial advisers will have another annual fee to pay under the Government’s proposal for an annual financial adviser registration under its new disciplinary regime.

In its exposure draft legislation regarding the new regime, the Government said it proposed that a fee to register would be payable and that the registration would need to be renewed annually.

“This will be set in the Corporations (Fees) Regulations 2001. The Government will consult on these regulations at a later date,” it said.

“…Registration needs to be renewed annually. However, provided that the registration renewal form has been submitted by the due date, a financial adviser can continue to provide advice without needing to wait for ASIC [the Australian Securities Investments Commission] to confirm that the adviser’s registration has been renewed.”

The obligation for an adviser to be registered would sit with the licensee and if the adviser was the licence holder, the adviser would be registering themselves.

Licensees had between 1 January, 2022, until 1 January, 2023, to register existing advisers to be able to continue to provide advice.

To register, the licensee would need to submit a registration form to ASIC which would need to include:

  • A declaration from the adviser that they are a fit and proper person;
  • A declaration from the licensee that the person has met the education and training standards; and
  • A declaration from the licensee that they are not aware of any reason why the adviser is not a fit and proper person. This is required to be based on information already available to the licensee and will not require the licensee to undertake additional investigation.

ASIC would then register the adviser on the Financial Advisers Register (FAR).

The Government noted if an adviser provided advice while unregistered, and their licensee had not revoked their authorisation, the licensee was subject to penalties.

“This places the onus on the licensee to register the adviser, or revoke their authorisation,” it said.

“If an adviser gives advice and the ‘adviser’ is not authorised by a licensee (or their authorisation has ceased) – then it is the adviser who is in breach.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 11 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo