Ampfpa canvasses litigation funder to undewrite AMP class action

amp financial planners association AMPFPA AMP Limited legal action bolr

6 September 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The AMP Financial Planners Association (AMPFPA) is contemplating resorting to a litigation funder to help underwrite a class action against AMP Limited, forewarning that such action may take up to two years.

The organisation has written to member advisers confirming that AMP Limited’s changes to Buy of Last Resort (BOLR) contracts give rise to the ability of members to take action against the company either individually or by way of a class action.

However, at the same time, the ampfpa has acknowledged that members may be able to reach individual agreements with AMP and that it is aware “that some members are being approached by AMP with various options in relation to BOLR payments and future arrangements”.

The letter to members, said that on ampfpa’s view of how the BOLR Policy operates, members had a range of potential legal claims against AMP.

“The range of potential legal claims that ampfpa considers members may have in respect of their BOLR rights include:

  1. Claims to enforce contractual rights to the 13 month notice period and/or substantive consultation with ampfpa; and
  2. Claims seeking to recover damages suffered as a result of AMP’s conduct.

It then went on to suggest that the claims might be capable of being resolved by way of a negotiated agreement with AMP or via legal action which might be as individual claims or by way of class actions.

The letter then canvassed members contributing to a fund to pay for a class action, turning to an external specialist litigation funder or a combination of both.

“It is open to individual members to take their own legal action in respect of their specific circumstances. The costs and time involved in individual claims will depend on the specific circumstances. Members should obtain their own legal advice about the individual legal claims which may be open to them, and about their other legal and commercial options,” the letter said.

“However, the costs of each member bringing their own claims individually is likely to be prohibitive for many members, and may involve members duplicating legal and other claim costs in respect of key issues.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS