AMP Super had no knowledge of AMP adviser activity
There were regulatory concerns in 2017 that the trustee of AMP Super did not have any knowledge of which AMP advisers were directing their clients to invest in AMP Super and whether that advice was appropriate.
The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry was told that the concerns were held by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) which wrote to the trustee in April, last year.
That letter stated that APRA had observed that AMP Super was reliant on AMP Advice and AMP Life to monitor adviser activities and to manage the associated risks of distribution of superannuation products.
It went on to state: “AMP Super does not have visibility of the advisers who direct members to invest in their superannuation products or if the strategies for members are appropriate”.
Receipt of the APRA letter was confirmed by director, regulatory governance for AMP/NM Super, Rachel Sansom who said changes were now being implemented to address the situation.
“We’re getting increased visibility, but one of the things we’re looking to take into account is the different perspectives from if you have a financial adviser they’re looking at your whole financial situation one on one, if you like, while for the superannuation trustees, what we’re looking at is cohorts of members in aggregate,” Sansom said. “So, there will always be a limit to which the superannuation trustee perspective can actually add value but we’re certainly increasing our interest in the advice component.”
The Royal Commission also heard that the AMP Super trustee had been unaware of the fee for no service arrangements impacting members of the superannuation until they were raised during earlier hearings of the Royal Commission.
Recommended for you
Sequoia Financial Group has declined by five financial advisers in the past week, four of whom have opened up a new AFSL, according to Wealth Data.
Insignia Financial chief executive Scott Hartley has detailed whether the firm will be selecting an exclusive bidder for the second phase of due diligence as it awaits revised bids from three private equity players.
Insignia Financial has reported a statutory net loss after tax of $17 million in its first half results, although the firm has noted cost optimisation means this is an improvement from a $50 million loss last year.
With alternative funds being described as “impossible” for fund managers to target towards advisers without the support of BDMs for education, Money Management explores the evolving nature of the distribution role.
