AMP lambasted over CEO’s salary in face of BOLR blitz
AMP Limited is experiencing negative blow-back from both planners and planning related union groups as a result of its decision to upgrade the salary package of its chief executive, Francesco De Ferrari despite reporting a net loss of $2.5 billion.
While advisers made their negative views on the salary decision clear on the Money Management web site, the Financial Sector Union (FSU) pointed to the situation in which the company had left many planners.
FSU national assistant secretary, Nathan Rees said that while shareholders would be concerned about the direction AMP was taking, decisions taken by the corporation had also destroyed the livelihoods of scores of planners.
“AMP has treated planners poorly,” he said. “A total of 440 AMP financial planners have a contract to work in partnership with AMP. That contract stipulates that in the event the planner’s business is bought back by AMP, it will be acquired at four times the value of annual revenue.”
“Late last year, AMP simply decided they would buy these businesses from their own planners for only one and a half times annual revenue. This has effectively reduced the value of each planner’s business by more than 60%,” Rees said.
He said that, to make it worse, many planners had borrowed money from AMP to establish their business but AMP still wanted the money back.
“Any reasonable person would see that this is simply wrong,” Rees said. “Planners are losing their homes and their livelihoods and there are genuine concerns about the mental health impacts of this decision by AMP.”
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
