AMP claims adviser class action precludes answering BOLR questions
AMP Limited has cited legal action mounted against it by its own financial advisers as a reason why it can’t answer key questions around its Buyer of Last Resort (BOLR) arrangements posed by a Parliamentary Committee.
AMP was asked the questions in the context of the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics but cited the existence of a Class Action as precluding providing answers.
“The subject matter of the questions relate to a class action. It is inappropriate for us to respond to matters that are subject to court proceedings,” AMP’s formal answer said this week. “On request and if it would assist, we can provide to the committee a copy of the Statement of Claim filed on 28 July 2020 and AMP Financial Planning’s defence (once filed).”
ACT Labor member and deputy chair of the committee, Andrew Leigh had placed on notice a series of questions based on the AMP BOLR arrangements.
“In regards to the sale and valuation of client books:
(a) In the current class action that AMP financial planners have filed against AMP, it’s reported that AMP sold ‘books’ to independent financial planners at four times the annual revenue of the clients contained within them. Is this correct?
(b) Is there an industry standard valuation for such client books? If so, is it 2.5 times the annual revenue?
(c) If the industry standard is 2.5 times annual revenue, why did AMP value the books at four times the annual revenue?
(d) What percentage of the financial planners whose client books have been devalued funded the purchase of that client book with financing or credit provided by AMP?
(e) Were there AMP financial planners who funded the purchase through finance or credit provided by lenders other than AMP?
(f) When did AMP first consider reducing the Buyer of Last Resort clause?
(g) For financial planners who sought finance from AMP bank to fund their business after AMP had first considered reducing the ‘book’ value from four times to 2.5 times the annual revenue, what rate of recurring revenue was their business valued at for lending purposes?
(h) After AMP first considered reducing the Buyer of Last Resort rate, did AMP provide planners who were seeking to obtain finance with advice that the book value was being re-evaluated?”
Recommended for you
After seven years at the company, Iress’ chief technology officer for wealth management APAC, Anthony Gerrits, has departed as the firm commences a search process to fill the role.
With advice firms thinking about scaling up in 2025, research has detailed the main avenues financial advisers say they have used for successful recruitment.
The board of Insignia Financial has reached a decision regarding the possible acquisition of the firm by US private equity giant Bain Capital.
Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses.
