AMP BOLR victims see another delay to settlement

federal court amp bolr

22 February 2024
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

The AMP buyer of last resort (BOLR) proceedings have hit another delay after a case management hearing to approve the settlement was postponed. 

A case management hearing to approve the $100 million settlement was scheduled to take place on 21 February, but the hearing was postponed. 

Comments from both AMP and the Federal Court in Melbourne confirmed no new date has been set yet.

“The case management hearing has been vacated and chambers are awaiting consent orders from the parties regarding next steps,” the court said.

This is the second delay after the initial case management hearing on 22 December 2023, following the settlement decision that was vacated until this month.

Applicants had been requested to file any interlocutory application in relation to the settlement by 2 February. 

It was announced in November 2023 that AMP had agreed to pay a settlement of $100 million, having announced in August that it would appeal the July verdict of Justice Mark Moshinsky and engage in mediation. 

This was double the volume AMP had set aside in provisions in August and would address all aspects of the class action, including the proposed appeal.

In a statement to the ASX in November, the firm said: “The settlement is for a total of $100 million and is subject to the finalisation an execution of a deed of settlement and approval by the Federal Court of Australia. 

“AMP made a provision of $50 million in its 1H23 financial statement based on the judgment of 5 July 2023.”

The class action was filed with the Federal Court in Melbourne back in 2020 on behalf of advisers who had been authorised by AMP Financial Planning (AMPFP). The claim related to changes made by the firm to its BOLR policy in 2019. This had seen AMPFP cut its BOLR terms without notice from 4x recurring revenue to a maximum of 2.5x. 

The verdict on the class action was issued by Justice Moshinsky on 5 July, ruling that the changes made by AMP with immediate effect were not authorised under the legislative, economic or product provisions and “were ineffective”.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS