AMP and AXA funds deemed ‘fallen angels’
Four equity funds from AMP, AXA and Clime were placed in the ‘fallen angels’ category by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) fund rating trends summary for the first half of 2010.
The report, titled Rising Stars and Fallen Angels, defined AXA Wholesale Australian Equity Growth Fund and AMP’s Capital Australian Small Companies Fund as funds at risk of being removed from approved product lists.
At the same time, funds from Aberdeen, Advance, Hunter and MLC appear to be doing well, as they have been placed in the ‘rising stars’ category.
S&P describes ‘rising stars’ as three-star and higher rated funds, which wealth management groups and platforms typically consider ‘investment quality’.
S&P’s head of fund research, Leanne Milton, said the rating sentiment was largely positive for the first half of the year.
“In [the second quarter], we affirmed more fund ratings, the ratio of upgrades outpaced downgrades, and we assigned four-star ratings to 59 per cent of new funds assessed,” Milton said.
“The only counterpoint to this positive momentum was the significant increase in ‘on hold’ ratings in the second quarter, driven by personnel changes within investment teams,” she added.
S&P has placed a total of 26 funds on hold in the first half of 2010, most of which are Australian and international equities.
Fund ratings house also took a total of 242 rating actions in the same period, affecting $80.6 billion of funds under management in retail managed investment schemes.
Recommended for you
The FSCP has announced its latest verdict, suspending an adviser’s registration for failing to comply with his obligations when providing advice to three clients.
Having sold Madison to Infocus earlier this year, Clime has now set up a new financial advice licensee with eight advisers.
With licensees such as Insignia looking to AI for advice efficiencies, they are being urged to write clear AI policies as soon as possible to prevent a “Wild West” of providers being used by their practices.
Iress has revealed the number of clients per adviser that top advice firms serve, as well as how many client meetings they conduct each week.
