AMP accused of inducing planners into debt

amp FPA amp fpa neil macdonald

12 August 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

AMP is in breach of its contractual obligations to its own planners because it has not given them sufficient notice of its changes to buyer of last resort and other arrangements, according to the AMP Financial Planners Association (AMP-FPA).

Because of this, the AMP FPA has declared it will be contesting the significant changes announced by AMP last week including the BOLR changes and moves which are likely to see the departure of a large number of advisers.

The Association has signalled that it will be arguing that large numbers of advisers had been induced into debt by AMP to buy books of clients from exiting AMP advisers at four times recurring revenue and that that debt had been funded by AMP Bank.

AMP-FPA chief executive, Neil Macdonald, said that the company was obliged to consult with the association over changes to the terms of BOLR arrangements and to also give members of the association 13 months’ notice of any change that would have a detrimental effect.

“AMP has done neither,” Macdonald said.

He also claimed that AMP’s pinning of BOLR to what it claims is a market value of 2.5 per cent is disingenuous because it ignores past practice and precedent.

“Advisers had to pay four times recurring revenue to buy into the right to service an AMP client book.  That was the price set by AMP. It was never a market value. The adviser did not own the client book or any goodwill and would never have paid four times without AMP’s promise to pay four times when the adviser retired from the industry,” Macdonald said.

“This was AMP’s mechanism to attract and retain advisers long term. But now, AMP is wanting to keep the four times entry price for itself and only pay back 2.5 times.
   
“AMP has already broken trust with its own customers and it has now broken trust with its own people,” he said. “The reduction of the multiple applied under the BOLR terms is potentially disastrous to many advisers, particularly those who have given notice but have not yet been bought out.”
 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS