AmEx advisers vent spleen

platforms/financial-services-group/

10 April 2001
| By Lachlan Gilbert |

Nearly 1000 of American Express (AmEX) Financial Advisors’ 7100 franchisees have taken a stand against the AmEx head office.

The advisers have united in a non-profit group called the Association of Financial Planning Professionals (AFPP), which was set up a year ago as a place where disgruntled AmEx advisers can express their opinion free of corporate involvement.

Since March 2000, AmEx has given more than 11,000 advisers the choice to belong to one of three different career paths. One was that advisers stay with the financial services group as a company employee. Another path allowed advisers to become owners of their own franchises, while another alternative allowed advisers to become independent contractors affiliated with Securities America, a broker-dealer owned by AmEx.

A great majority, or more than 7100 advisers, opted for the franchise route, while the corresponding numbers of advisers opting for the first and third career platforms pales in comparison, with only 3700 remaining with the company and another 1200 becoming contractors.

But what the advisers who opted for the franchise option were not aware of, or so says the AFPP, was that head office would be charging each franchisee a monthly technology fee of US$95 in addition to the monthly association fee of US$390.

The AFPP, which has put on five part time assistants to assist with administration as well as hiring representation from a law firm, has written a letter of opposition to AmEx senior vice president Brian Heath about the technology fees.

Heath responded with a letter stating that the franchise agreement clearly allowed AmEx to charge the technology access fee.

"In providing the AEFA (American Express Financial Advisors) documents, we urged advisors to read the documents in their totality," he wrote.

However, the AFPP says the AEFA did not give advisers enough time to read the lengthy documents outlining the terms of the franchises, and were told to sign the document or be fired.

AmEx, in return, disputes this, saying that advisers were given several weeks to read the agreements, and could have hired a lawyer to assist with it.

The AFPP plans to expand its numbers with more recruits from AmEx advisers. AFPP president S Kenneth Wilmot says that before the organisation will be in a position to effect change, it will need to be much larger. The main task at the moment is to be taken seriously by head office.

"They (AmEx) don't want to recognise us because they don't control us," Wilmott says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 19 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo