ALP must not block surcharge Bill: ASFA

ASFA government association of superannuation funds superannuation funds chief executive capital gains

30 May 2005
| By Ross Kelly |

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has called for smooth passage of the Bill to abolish the unpopular superannuation surcharge, which was introduced into Parliament yesterday, through both the lower and upper house.

"This has been an inequitable tax, and its removal should be supported by all the political parties," said ASFA chief executive Philippa Smith.

Asked which particular party ASFA is concerned about, Smith said “there had been mumblings in the Australian Labor Party (ALP).”

Smith says the ALP might try to block the Bill as part of a blanket rejection of the Government’s proposed tax cuts, but said suspicions have also been raised by the fact that Labor tried to block previous Bills reducing the surcharge.

If the ALP or any other party tries to block the Bill, it will only delay it’s introduction as the Government will take full control of the senate on July 1.

“I think it’s probably more a nuisance factor but we certainly don’t want the changes bogged down in political game play because it’s such a positive thing to happen which really does help simplify super,” said Smith.

“The ALP sometimes argues [the surcharge] is just for the rich. It had a much more damaging effect than that.”

The surcharge, which was introduced by the Howard Government when it came to power in 1996, was scrapped as part of Peter Costello’s ninth budget, released on May 10.

It was intended to increase taxes for people on higher incomes. But many lower income earners who made large one-off payments to superannuation as they approached retirement also had to pay it.

According to Smith, reportable fringe benefits, certain long service leave entitlements and termination payments were also counted as income by the Government, so people facing redundancy were “often pushed into surcharge territory.”

"…many middle income earners were caught by the surcharge, including police and workers with shift allowances, or who had employer-provided accommodation."

"Those with fluctuating incomes were also unfairly caught by this super tax, such as women or others with broken work patterns trying to catch up in their savings. Selling an investment property could also trigger the surcharge through inclusion of capital gains in taxable income," she said.

According to AFSA, over 1 million Australians will be better off if the Bill passes.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS