AIST argues for flexibility on fund committee memberships

AIST APRA best interests superannuation trustees australian prudential regulation authority director federal opposition trustee

24 July 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has urged the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to be more flexible about who can hold key positions on superannuation fund committees.

In a submission to APRA responding to draft prudential standards, the AIST has taken issue with a proposal that only directors of the superannuation fund can hold the position of chair on key committees.

"This requirement is inflexible and may not be in the best interests of beneficiaries," the AIST submission says.

The AIST submission has come amid concerns expressed by the Federal Opposition about multiple directorships, particularly with respect to industry funds.

The AIST said that while it acknowledged the need for director accountability with regard to committees of the board, it was the current practice of some funds to have external non-directors engaged as committee chairs in specialist areas, "for example investment and audit".

"While AIST recognises that APRA may be aware of particular instances where this arrangement has not been in the members' best interests, the new standards and trustee director obligations will result in these external chairs becoming responsible persons, subject to the new individual fit and proper requirements, and trustees becoming more accountable for the registrable superannuation entity licensee's business operations.

"AIST submits that there are sufficient protections in place through the combination of new standards and new obligations on trustees and individual directors to address any concerns that APRA may have in this area," the submission said.

The AIST also raised issues with an APRA proposal to have remuneration and audit committees comprised only of non-executive directors.

"We know, however, that some funds currently engage non-directors as chairs or committee members of these committees," it said.

"Provided these arrangements are working well, AIST submits that such arrangements should be allowed with appropriate delegations and accountabilities in place, especially with the protections offered by the new legislative and regulatory regime."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS